- The purpose of my project is to convince people that uncanny valley shouldn't be taken too seriously since it has no real evidence. I haven't actually posted my draft yet since I'm not done with it, but I feel it fulfills that fairly well.
- After reviewing other people's articles, I do want to focus more on my opposing groups as I want to convert them to my line of thinking. After I publish my draft, I'll go back in and add more of their viewpoints.
- I'm revising for my opposition groups. Before I felt I was preaching to the choir as I wasn't really addressing their points. I'll reach out to them more.
- How will aspects change?
- Length will probably increase to account for other views.
- Format will still likely be a video. I've worked in video and I feel it supports my arguments well.
- Appearance will probably involve a lot of graphics and visuals to show examples.
- Conclusion will change. I'll probably side more with my opposition group than I planned.
- Structure will likely stay the same. It was mostly informative with some attempts at humor periodically.
- I will try and get in depth. All of my sources are published research and I should get pretty explanatory.
Saturday, November 14, 2015
12.4 Reflection on Project 3 Draft
I reviewed Felicia and Andrew's projects.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It seems like after reviewing your draft you have decided on altering your audience or at least focusing more. I think you answered the questions well and that you have a good handle on how to revise your draft.
ReplyDelete